Academic Employees

Academic Employees


This site covers the performance management process for UVA Academic Staff (University Regular Staff, Classified Staff, and A&P Faculty). Review the Eligibility section below for more information on which staff types participate in this performance process.

Performance Engagement (PE) participants should view the PE webpage for information and resources specific to the quarterly process.

Performance Engagement

Latest Updates

ATTENTION: Please note that new hire probation employees do not receive the 2025 year-end self-evaluation. If you have been hired in the past year and believe you are missing your self-eval, double check if you are still on an active new hire probation period. New hire probation employee's receive their self-evals a month prior to their probation end date.

2025 Self-Evaluations are due on January 9, 2026. See the timeline below for all due dates.

McIntire Regular Staff now participates in the quarterly Performance Engagement process.

Information & Resources

  • Eligibility (Who completes an appraisal)

    The following employees can expect to receive a performance review in Workday:

    • Classified Staff
    • Regular University Staff (UStaff) employees
    • A&P Faculty

    Employees excluded from completing Academic goal setting and year-end performance appraisals/reviews:

    • Academic Wage and Temporary employees
    • Professional Research Staff
    • Non-A&P Faculty
    • School of Medicine and Claude Moore Health Sciences Library Regular and Classified Staff, and A&P faculty members (you are included in the UVA Health appraisal process)
    • Employees on New Hire Probation
    • New hires in a school or unit participating in the CY performance cycle whose start date or probation end date is after September 30 of the active performance cycle, and new hires in a school or unit participating in the FY performance cycle whose start date or probation end date is after March 31 of the active performance cycle.
    • Identified Coaching staff (contact your HRBP with questions on identified positions)

    All schools/units follow the calendar year process with the exception of Advancement, Athletics, Audit, and EOCR who follow a fiscal year process. Finance, HR, ITS and McIntire are following the quarterly process. 

  • Process & Timeline

    Calendar Year 2025 Timeline:

    • Dec 1, 2025: Self-evaluations launch
    • Jan 09, 2026: Self-evaluations due
    • Jan 30, 2026: All incomplete self-evaluations mass-advance to managers
    • Jan 30, 2026: Classified Staff manager evaluations due (Classified Staff only)
    • Feb 13, 2026: Classified Staff secondary review/approval due (Classified Staff only)
    • Feb 27, 2026: All manager evaluations, 1:1s, and acknowledgements due

    Employee Acknowledgements: You should acknowledge your review immediately after receiving and reviewing.

    You have 10 workdays to appeal your review. If you wish to appeal your review, follow the appeals process outlined here.

    The above timelines are suggested: Schools/units may create and adhere to their own deadlines (except for the incomplete self-evaluation mass advancement dates). 

    It is highly recommended managers and employees discuss performance regularly throughout the year using our Guide to Regular Performance Check-Ins.

    For information on salary increases, please visit the compensation page.

    Fiscal Year 2025 Timeline (Advancement, Athletics, Audit, and EOCR):

    • Jun 2, 2025: Self-evaluations launch
    • Jul 11, 2025: Self-evaluations due
    • Jul 31, 2025: All incomplete self-evaluations mass-advance to managers
    • Jul 31, 2025: Classified Staff manager evaluations due (Classified Staff only)
    • Aug 15, 2025: Classified Staff secondary review/approval due (Classified Staff only)
    • Aug 29, 2025: All manager evaluations, 1:1s, and acknowledgements due
  • Rating Scale

    5-Exceptional:

    Significantly and consistently exceeds expected performance level.

    4-Highly Effective:

    Consistently achieves and often exceeds expected performance level.

    3-Effective:

    Consistently achieves expected performance level.

    2-Inconsistent:

    Inconsistently achieves expected performance level; needs improvement.

    1-Unsatisfactory:

    Rarely achieves expected performance level; requires significant and immediate corrective action.


    Discuss with your manager their specific expectations for each rating. Leaders are strongly encouraged to hold calibration sessions with their teams and departments. If you wish to appeal your rating or quarterly check-in from your manager, follow the appeals process outlined here.

    UPDATED: DHRM updated their policy in August of 2025 that included moving to a 5-point rating scale. So there is no longer a conversation for Classified Staff ratings (except for SOM Classified Staff).

    The above information is as of January 2026.

    Performance Rating Rubric
  • Managers of Classified Staff

    Updated: As of August 2025, DHRM no longer requires the Extraordinary Contribution or Notice of Improvement/Substandard Performance forms in performance reviews for Classified Staff.

  • Guides & Job Aids

  • How AI Can Assist with Performance Reviews

    AI tools like Microsoft Copilot can simplify the process of writing performance reviews, helping both managers and employees craft balanced, clear, and impactful reviews. Here's how AI can assist:

    • Structure Reviews: AI can help organize thoughts into a cohesive format, combining achievements and areas for growth in a professional tone.
    • Refine Language: Ensure your review strikes the right balance between encouragement and constructive feedback with AI’s tone adjustments.
    • Highlight Achievements: Input key successes, and AI can frame them in ways that reflect impact and contributions clearly.
    • Turn Feedback Into Actions: AI can transform general observations into actionable insights, helping you focus on growth opportunities.
    • Summarize Key Points: Use AI to distill performance data or notes into concise, easy-to-understand highlights.

    Note: AI is a tool to enhance clarity and efficiency but should complement authentic, thoughtful input. Copilot is the University-approved, enterprise-protected tool for Generative AI that has the added privilege of enterprise security, meaning what you tell it and/or upload to it stays within UVA.

    UVA ITS Generative AI Tools (Copilot)